Participants were randomized to one of four study arms: (1) automatic advance to the next question and no opportunity to go back (auto/no back) (2) automatic advance to the next questions with an opportunity to go back (auto/back) (3) next button to go to the next question and no opportunity to go back (next/no back) or (4) next button to go to the next question with an opportunity to go back (next/back). One item was presented to the study participants on each screen. Sample items include “I am happy with how much I do for my family,” “I am satisfied with my ability to work (include work at home),” “I am satisfied with my current level of social activity,” and “I am satisfied with my ability to do leisure activities.” These items were preliminary versions of item banks created for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. Sample items include “I am limited in doing my work (include work at home),” “I am able to do all of my regular family activities,” and “I am able to do all of my regular leisure activities.” We also administered 56 items measuring satisfaction with social/role activities using a 5-category not at all to very much response scale. We administered 56 items assessing performance of social/role activities rated on a 5-category never to always response scale. Polimetrix sent out a study invitation to the panel and the first ones to respond were included. Panel members generally receive about four surveys per year and earn “polling points” that can be redeemed for rewards. We included 807 participants from a national, web-based polling company, Polimetrix (now YouGov Polimetrix, Over one million adult panel members have provided email addresses, contact information, and responses to core profile items in order to receive occasional surveys about a variety of subjects. With this target sample, we would have 80% power to detect a small effect (effect size = 0.28) between two groups. Given the similarity in missing data, reliability and mean scale scores with or without use of the next button, we recommend automatic advancement to the next item with the option to go back to the previous item.īased on power calculations, we targeted a sample of 800 study participants (200 for each of 4 study arms). Time to complete the survey was about 50% longer when respondents were required to use a next button to go on. We found no difference in missing data, internal consistency reliability, and domain scores by group. Participants were randomly assigned to either (1) automatic advance to the next question with no opportunity to go back (auto/no back) (2) automatic advance to the next questions with an opportunity to go back (auto/back) (3) next button to go to the next question with no opportunity to go back (next/no back) or (4) next button to go to the next question with an opportunity to go back (next/back). MethodsĪ sample of 807 participants (mean age of 53 64% women, 83% non-Hispanic white 81% some college or college graduates) from the YouGov Polimetrix panel was administered 56 items assessing performance of social/role activities and 56 items measuring satisfaction with social/role activities. For more information about Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), visit assess the impact of including next and back buttons on response burden and measurement reliability of computer-based surveys. Oracle offers a comprehensive and fully integrated stack of cloud applications and platform services. My Oracle Support provides customers with access to over a million knowledge articles and a vibrant support community of peers and Oracle experts. To view full details, sign in with your My Oracle Support account.ĭon't have a My Oracle Support account? Click to get started! Supplier info does not populate on time and material req after added on reqġ) assign "Land on Requisition Settings" ePro Role Action to userĢ) enter Supplier Info and use Overrin de radio button on Settings pageĥ) for Time and Materials see that the defaults added are not there. Information in this document applies to any platform. PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM eProcurement - Version 9.2 and later Supplier Info Does Not Populate On Time And Material Req After Added On Req Settings
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |